Imagine that someone else can see the morality a conniving schemer is implanting into someone else’s head but for them all feels funkydory as all gleams pristine and pleasant, with nothing the target says ever feeling intangibly transactional? If they shun you away, who did what?
They say we need safe spaces to prevent feeling typecasted, chastised or alienated. But what if including anyone into a “closed box” or “open air” social circle goes too far into the other extreme end, alas also disrupting social cohesion?
They can’t articulate their issues in words, so I can only haphazardly triangulate weird patternistic events together.
Inspired from an anonymous question someone asked me on Tellonym
What is the acceptable scope of opinions that are alllowed to be expressed? Tynamite expresses his opinion on political correctness and censorship.
In life we are all expected to behave responsibly and ethically, and to uphold that duty all the time.
Have you ever wondered why there’s so many suffering refugees in the world, yet countries still have borders? Me too!
Britain’s Investigative Powers Act is a mass survelliance law that has far reaching implications for our privacy. Learn more about it here.
The amount of time you can spend on someone, and have it all be wasted is atonishing! Why can’t people be kind, open and tolerant any more?
Most people who are popular, made most of their friends from association. So what benefits are derived from this?